|
Breathalyzer Test:Attorney General INFORMATION BULLETIN [it may be the case that an officer holds his finger over the exit port on a breathalyzer and spikes your B.A.C. reading up some 0.08 points or more. There have been cases where blocking the exit port raises the B.A.C. reading by 0.12. That alone constitutes nearly a felony charge of DUI / DWI in the state of Nevada. Since its inception, the breathalyzer test to detect intoxication has been fraught with hazards. The usual breath machine or device Nevada police use is the Intoxilyzer 5000. The chief opponents of the field device, now commonly known as the Breathalyzer have always held that they are not accurate. “Are the police maintaining the equipment of breath machine to make sure that it's accurate.” Customarily what they attempt to do is analyze the content of alcohol or ethanol in your breath. This is not always possible. Quite a few devices are nearly incapable of detecting ethanol at all or incapable of distinguishing other chemicals on the breath from ethanol. For instance, should you be on some medication, be diabetic, a chronic abuser of alcohol, i.e. alcoholic it might give a false positive reaction. The true problem is that it attempts to read the methyl group commonly found in ethanol. However, this group is present in all the aforementioned cases as well. In short it isn’t specific enough to the exclusion of all other compounds to justify it as unquestionable proof of alcohol intoxication. “What should I do when I’m pulled over by the police? Your rights are guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.” There is no penalty for refusing a Field Sobriety Tests or the breathalyzer test in the field, in the state of Nevada. Also, given your Miranda Rights you should be polite but refuse any and all questions. You would be well advised to request your attorney immediately following your arrest.
Blood Test:It is the per se law that by your agreement to own a Nevada Drivers License, you give tacit consent to submit to a blood alcohol test, at the station, and thus cannot refuse it. Your Nevada DUI attorney may be able to argue down the per se law in light of the 1985 Supreme Court ruling in Francis v. Franklin. You may want to bring this case to the attention of your attorney. It might be a very good piece to assist him / her with. Design by Boundless Enterprise: Kevin Cardinale - 5 - Las Vegas DUI Lawyer | Nevada DUI Attorney | Nevada DUI Law | DUI Detection | DUI Tests | DUI Penalties | DUI License Issues | DUI Suspension | DUI Record | Las Vegas DUI Issues | DUI Articles | DUI Blog | About Us | Disclaimer | Archives | Site Map | Contact Us
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||